From accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2026, lease accounting under FRS 102 has changed significantly. The updated standard introduces a single on-balance sheet lease model for lessees, similar in structure to IFRS 16.
This means discount rates are no longer a niche issue mainly affecting finance leases. Discounting is now required for most lease liabilities under FRS 102, making the selection and documentation of the discount rate a core compliance requirement.
For UK finance teams, this creates a practical question:
Which discount rate should be used under FRS 102, and how does it compare to IFRS 16?
This is also where the term OBR (Obtainable Borrowing Rate) becomes relevant: a practical and auditable way to describe the rate an entity could realistically obtain.
In this article: This article explains how discount rates work under the revised FRS 102 lease model from 2026, how to apply the interest rate implicit in the lease, and how to document an Obtainable Borrowing Rate (OBR). It also compares FRS 102 and IFRS 16 requirements and highlights common audit pitfalls.
A lease liability is measured as the present value of future lease payments. That present value depends directly on the discount rate. A higher discount rate produces a lower lease liability. A lower discount rate produces a higher lease liability.
This affects:
Because lease liabilities are now widely recognised under FRS 102, discount rate methodology has become a major focus area for auditors.
Read more: How to prepare for your next audit under FRS 102 Section 20.
FRS 102 applies a hierarchy similar to IFRS 16.
The interest rate implicit in the lease is the rate that discounts:
to equal the fair value of the underlying asset at lease commencement.
In practice, this rate is often difficult to determine because it requires information the lessee may not have, such as:
If the implicit rate cannot be reliably determined, FRS 102 requires an alternative.
Where the implicit rate is unavailable, the lessee uses a borrowing rate concept, which in practice means:
The rate the entity would pay to borrow funds to obtain an asset of similar value over a similar term.
This is where UK finance teams often use the term OBR (Obtainable Borrowing Rate).
A practical definition is:
The Obtainable Borrowing Rate (OBR) is the interest rate a company could realistically obtain at the measurement date to borrow funds over a similar term, in a similar currency, and with a similar security profile, to acquire an asset of comparable value.
This framing matters because it focuses on:
… rather than theoretical modelling.
Read more: FRS 102 lease changes 2026 compared with IFRS 16.
A defensible OBR should reflect four main factors:
A 2-year lease should not automatically use a 10-year borrowing rate.
For UK entities, most leases are in GBP, but international groups may need separate curves for EUR or USD.
The rate should reflect the lessee’s credit risk at the measurement date.
Lease liabilities are often viewed as secured-like in substance, because the underlying asset can act as collateral. The chosen approach must be consistent and documented.
Read more: FRS 102 Section 20: Why spreadsheets break – and how to get it right.
Auditors typically expect OBR to be supported by observable inputs. Common evidence sources include:
The key is not to prove an exact rate, but to demonstrate that the chosen rate is reasonable, consistent, and based on evidence.
While FRS 102 and IFRS 16 now share a similar lease recognition model, IFRS 16 remains more detailed in practical guidance.
|
Topic |
Revised FRS 102 (2026) |
IFRS 16 |
|
Recognition model |
Similar to IFRS 16 |
Single model |
|
Rate hierarchy |
Implicit rate first, then borrowing rate |
Same principle |
|
Implementation detail |
More simplified |
More prescriptive |
|
Portfolio discount rates |
Often allowed if reasonable |
Common but more regulated by expectations |
|
Reassessment triggers |
Generally fewer detailed rules |
More explicit remeasurement triggers |
In short: the conceptual approach is aligned, but IFRS 16 tends to require more granular segmentation and documentation.
Scenario:
PV factor (approx.) = 4.4518
PV ≈ £50,000 × 4.4518 = £222,590
PV factor (approx.) = 4.1002
PV ≈ £50,000 × 4.1002 = £205,010
A 3% difference reduces the lease liability by approximately £17,580.
For property leases or fleet portfolios, the impact can be far larger.
This is why discount rates now receive increased audit scrutiny under FRS 102.
Using one discount rate for all leases is risky unless the lease portfolio is highly consistent.
A practical approach is to segment discount rates by:
This improves consistency and reduces audit challenges.
The most common issues arise when the process is inconsistent or undocumented.
Typical audit findings include:
Under the revised FRS 102, discount rates are now applied to a broader population of leases, which increases the importance of governance.
Read more: FRS 102: Can any leases still remain off-balance sheet?
A robust discount rate file typically includes:
This makes the OBR defensible even if the rate itself is judgemental.
The interest rate implicit in the lease should be used if practicable. If not, a borrowing rate concept is used.
OBR is a practical term used to describe the rate the entity could realistically obtain for a similar term, currency and security profile. It helps build an audit-ready discount rate methodology.
They are conceptually similar. OBR is often used as a more practical and evidence-driven way of describing that rate.
It is possible, but often difficult to justify. Most entities need some segmentation by term and currency.
Discount rates are set at lease commencement and are typically only updated if a lease is modified or remeasured.
Disclaimer: House of Control is a software company. We do not offer FRS 102 compliance consulting services. Thus, following this guidance does not guarantee compliance with all FRS 102 legal requirements. The contents of the article are based on our own research of the FRS 102 requirements and our experience with lease accounting, and includes inspiration from various actors offering compliance services. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for any failure to comply with FRS 102 requirements or resulting from the use of this guidance.